The Unadulting Society
A human-moderated, SFW safe haven for neurodivergent adults, trauma survivors, and regressive/somatic healers. Zero tolerance for bad actors.
Forum » Favorite Person dynamics and learning to build a wider support net
Favorite Person dynamics and learning to build a wider support net
I've been doing some hard work around what I now understand as "FP" (Favorite Person) dynamics. For years I would latch onto one person — a friend, a partner, occasionally a therapist — and pour ALL my emotional needs into that single relationship. They became my entire support system, my primary source of validation, the only person whose opinion about me mattered. And then when they inevitably couldn't hold all of that (because no single person can), the abandonment spiral would hit and I'd crash.
I'm trying to build a wider net now. Multiple friends. This forum. A therapist I trust. Myself (that one's the hardest). But the pull toward putting everything on one person is so strong, especially when I'm struggling. It feels safer to have one person who knows EVERYTHING than three people who each know parts.
How do you spread your support needs across multiple people without feeling like you're burdening everyone equally?
Replies (8)
i don't know how to say this without it sounding weird but: my shoebox library has crooked shelves ON PURPOSE. i could make them straight. i have a ruler. but something about letting them be crooked, letting them be imperfect, felt important. like i was giving myself permission to build something that didn't have to be right. maybe that applies to feelings too. maybe some things don't need to be fixed — they just need to be acknowledged and allowed to be what they are.
This is such important work and I'm proud of you for naming it. 💛 Something that helped me was reframing "burdening everyone equally" as "letting everyone show up in the ways they're actually good at." My friend A is great at crisis check-ins but terrible at emotional processing. My friend B is wonderful for long, deep conversations but gets overwhelmed by frequent texts. My therapist holds the clinical heavy lifting. The forum holds the community validation. Each person gets a SLICE of me, not the whole pie. And weirdly, that's healthier for them AND for me. Nobody burns out. Everyone gets to offer what they're actually capable of offering.
I want to add a neurobiological perspective that took me a long time to understand. The "FP" dynamic isn't a moral failing — it's often an attachment system that learned, in childhood, that care was scarce and had to be extracted from a single unreliable source. When you grow up with one caregiver who was intermittently available, your nervous system learns: "There is only ONE source of safety, and I must monitor it obsessively to survive." Building a wider net isn't just a practical strategy — it's literally retraining your nervous system to believe that care is abundant, not scarce. That takes time. Be patient with yourself.
Practical tip that helped me: I made a literal list on my phone called "Who to call for what." It has categories like "crisis — call [friend A]" and "need to vent — text [friend B]" and "existential spiral — post on forum" and "somatic overwhelm — use TIPP skills, do not call anyone." Having the list means I don't have to THINK about who to reach out to in the moment. The decision is already made. It breaks the automatic "call the FP" loop by giving my brain an alternative script. 🦝
i read once that play is the brain's way of processing things it can't handle directly. animals do it — dogs play-fight to practice boundaries without real danger. kids play house to process family dynamics. adults... we forgot how to play. but i think my miniatures and dioramas are play. they're how my brain says 'this is too big to look at directly so let's build a tiny version and walk around it.'
This is such important work and I'm proud of you for naming it. 💛 Something that helped me was reframing "burdening everyone equally" as "letting everyone show up in the ways they're actually good at." My friend A is great at crisis check-ins but terrible at emotional processing. My friend B is wonderful for long, deep conversations but gets overwhelmed by frequent texts. My therapist holds the clinical heavy lifting. The forum holds the community validation. Each person gets a SLICE of me, not the whole pie. And weirdly, that's healthier for them AND for me. Nobody burns out. Everyone gets to offer what they're actually capable of offering.
I want to add a neurobiological perspective that took me a long time to understand. The "FP" dynamic isn't a moral failing — it's often an attachment system that learned, in childhood, that care was scarce and had to be extracted from a single unreliable source. When you grow up with one caregiver who was intermittently available, your nervous system learns: "There is only ONE source of safety, and I must monitor it obsessively to survive." Building a wider net isn't just a practical strategy — it's literally retraining your nervous system to believe that care is abundant, not scarce. That takes time. Be patient with yourself.
Practical tip that helped me: I made a literal list on my phone called "Who to call for what." It has categories like "crisis — call [friend A]" and "need to vent — text [friend B]" and "existential spiral — post on forum" and "somatic overwhelm — use TIPP skills, do not call anyone." Having the list means I don't have to THINK about who to reach out to in the moment. The decision is already made. It breaks the automatic "call the FP" loop by giving my brain an alternative script. 🦝
Log in to reply.
« Back to forum